ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the effect of anatomic resection (AR) and nonanatomic resection (NAR) on the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients of China Liver Cancer Staging (CNLC) Ⅰa.Methods:PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles on AR and NAR of CNLC Ⅰa stage HCC from January 2000 to March 2021. A meta-analysis was performed on patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, postoperative pathological characteristics and long-term prognosis.Results:Of 9 case-control studies were included in this study, there were 2761 patients, with 1727 cases in the AR group and 1034 cases in the NAR group. When compared with the NAR group, the AR group had lower proportion of liver cirrhosis, lower ICG R15 value, higher proportion of Child-Pugh A grade, larger tumor diameter, higher proportion of microvascular invasion, longer operation time and higher intraoperative blood loss. The AR group had a better postoperative 5-year disease-free survival rate [ OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.30-1.82, P<0.001] and a higher postoperative 5-year overall survival rate [ OR=1.27, 95% CI: 1.04-1.55, P=0.018]. Conclusion:AR is significantly better than NAR for preventing long-term recurrence and improving long-term survival in patients with CNLC Ⅰa stage HCC.
ABSTRACT
Anatomic resection aims to improve the surgical efficacy of hepatocellular carcinoma by systematic resection of portal territory. However, due to its deviation of traditional theory and practice, the oncology effect is questionable. Anatomic resection based on portal territory(PT-AR) is planned by the analysis of real portal vein territory, and performed complete resection of tumor-bearing portal territory by fluorescent guidance, while exposing typical inter-territory hepatic vein, so as to ensure the complete function of future liver remnant. PT-AR is based on the core theory of classical anatomic resection, which will correct the deviation of traditional theory and practice from the technical level, so as to lead a better surgical oncology outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare anatomic resection (AR) and non-anatomic resection (NAR)for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a factor in preventing intra-hepatic recurrence and local recurrence after the initial surgical procedure.Methods A systematic review and Meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials comparing anatomic resection with non-anatomic resection for HCC published from 1990to 2010 in PubMed and Medline,Coehrane Library,Embase,and Science Citation Index were searched.Intra-hepatic recurrence,including early and late recurrence,and local recurrence were primary outcomes.5-year survival and 5-year disease-free survival were secondary outcomes.Pooled effect was calculated by utilizing either fixed effects model or random effects model.Result Eleven nonrandomized studies including 1576 patients were identified and analyzed.810 patients were in the AR group and 766 were in the NAR group.Patients in the AR group were characterized by lower prevalence of cirrhosis,more favorable hepatic function,and larger tumor size and higher prevalence of macrovascular invasion compared with patients in the NAR group.Anatomic resection significantly reduced the risks of local recurrence (OR,0.27; 95％ CI,-0.17～0.43; P＜0.001) and achieved a better 5-year disease-free survival (OR,2.10; 95％ CI,-1.41 ～3.12; P=0.001) in HCC patients.Also,anatomic resection was marginally effective in decreasing early intra-hepatic recurrence.However,anatomic resection was not advantageous in preventing late intra-hepatic recurrence.No significant differences were found between the AR and NAR groups with respect to postoperative morbidity,mortality,and length of hospitalization.Conclusion Anatomic resection was recommended to be superior to non-anatomic resection in reducing the risks of local recurrence,early intra-hepatic recurrence and achieving a better 5-year disease-free survival in HCC patients.